A button to return our visitors BACK to our opening page -- our welcome pageA button to take our visitors to our News SectionA button to take our visitors to our Action Alert Page
A button to take our visitors to our calendar section
A button to take our visitors to our environment section
a button to take our visitors to our Support Our Troops page
A button to take our visitors to our book section
A button to take the visitor to our Election 2008 section
A button to take our visitors to our club news section which we call Ramblings from Jess. Jess is our Chair
A button to take our visitors to our opinion and editorial section
A button to take our visitors to a page with news of Governor Granholm, Senator Levin, and Senator Stebenow
A button to take our visitors to our links page, our contact information page, and to take the visitor to our policy page

 

 

LAST
WEEK'S
ARTICLES:
A button to take our visitors to our FRONT PAGE ANNEX of older items


 

Goodbye "George" Party

Say Goodbye to "George" Party:

Please add to your calendars: Saturday, January 17, 2009. At the Galien American Legion.

Festivities begin at 5:00 PM.

$3.00 cover charge ($5.00/couple) which will be given to the American Legion for the use of their hall.

A special handmade quilt to be raffled-off. The quilt will honor the election of Barack Obama and will be a real collector's item.

Potluck -- Bring a dish to pass. If you don't want to cook, for an additional $5.00 a meal will be served.

50/50 drawing.

Trivia Game.

Music.

 

POSTED 1/7/09

Panetta pick as CIA chief under fire

(From CNN) Could someone without intelligence experience

Leon Panetta

Leon Panetta, who has a strong background in economics, was chief of staff for President Bill Clinton.

effectively lead the United States' top spy agency, particularly in a time of war?

Two Democratic sources told CNN on Monday that President-elect Barack Obama will nominate longtime Washington power broker Leon Panetta to lead the Central Intelligence Agency.

The news provoked strong emotions in political and intelligence circles.

Michael Scheuer, a 22-year CIA analyst who worked in tracking Osama bin Laden, likened Panetta to a "political hack" Tuesday.

"He clearly has nothing on his curriculum vitae that suggests he should be the candidate for this job," Scheuer said. "It's not apparent he has any talent that is pertinent to the job."

Scheuer said Panetta's lack of experience could damage the agency and jeopardize national security.

"What Mr. Panetta's appointment says is that there's no urgency in the mind of the Obama administration that they think they can send somebody over there who can learn on the job and that the enemy will wait to attack us," he said.

But Panetta supporters describe him as a consummate manager and bipartisan Capitol Hill insider who gets things done without alienating people. The eight-term congressman also has decades of foreign policy experience and was part of the Iraq Study Group, whose recommendations led to changes in U.S. policy in the region.

Panetta, 70, also was director of President Bill Clinton's Office of Management and Budget.

Although he had not officially nominated Panetta, Obama on Tuesday praised his long service in Washington. "I have the utmost respect for Leon Panetta," Obama told reporters. "[He has] an impeccable record of integrity as chief of staff [under Bill Clinton]..."

THERE'S MORE - GO TO CNN STORY      POSTED 1/7/09

Barack Obama On Leon Panetta & CIA Nomination

Graphic to represent a You Tube video


POSTED 1/7/09

Conspiracy of Silence: Wage Collapse Caused Crisis

(From the Daily KOS by Tasini )

Every day, there is another example of the conspiracy of silence that pervades the traditional media's description of the current economic crisis. Sure, de-regulation, greed and pure stupidity has a lot to do with it. But, in truth, the underlying reason for the collapse has been a persistent war on the wages of American workers. Call it--egads--class warfare.

What is astonishing, and aggravating, is that much of the traditional media continues to point the finger at workers--those wild-spending people who just bought all those yachts, fur coats and mansions in far-away countries. And, now, shame on them, those wild-spending workers are doing something awful--they are saving money.

THERE'S MORE

POSTED 1/7/09

Peters, Schauer appear headed to key committees

BY TODD SPANGLER
FREE PRESS WASHINGTON STAFF

(From the Detroit Free Press) WASHINGTON -- Looks like Michigan’s two newest members of Congress are headed to a couple of key committees for the state’s interests.

The Democratic Caucus will decide Wednesday but it appears Rep. Gary Peters of Rep. Gary PetersBloomfield Township is going to the House Financial Services Committee, his appointment recommended by the House Steering Committee today.

The committee not only will help decide on the second round of rescue money for financial institutions -- a portion of which is to go to General Motors -- it also will write legislation on foreclosure relief. Michigan has been among the hardest hit states in the housing downtown.

Rep. Mark SchauerMeanwhile, Rep. Mark Schauer of Battle Creek, another Democrat, appears to be going to the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, which oversees road, bridge and waterway projects. The National Journal reported that appointment on its Web site Tuesday.

That said, it looks like Michigan will have only one member on House Appropriations, the most important committee when it comes to doling out federal funds. Detroit Democrat Carolyn Cheeks Kilpatrick is the only Michigander left on the panel after Republican Joe Knollenberg -- the ranking Republican on the Transportation Subcommittee -- was defeated by Peters.

THERE'S MORE - GO TO THE DETROIT FREE PRESS      POSTED 1/7/09

POSTED 1/7/09

Bush makes last-minute appointments

Bush laughing at the Ameircan peoplePresident Bush made another round of last-minute appointments Tuesday, giving 45 aides, supporters and others a parting gift as he leaves office: presidential appointments to boards and councils, with terms lasting three to six years after he leaves office.

The full list as released by the White House after the jump includes attorney general Michael Mukasey, deputy national security advisor Elliott Abrams, and Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff.

The President intends to appoint Robert D. McCallum, Jr., of Georgia, to be a Member of the J. William Fulbright Foreign Scholarships Board, for the remainder of a three-year term expiring 09/22/10.

The President intends to appoint Martin Faga, of Virginia, to be a Member of the Public Interest Declassification Board, for the remainder of a three-year term expiring 10/03/11.

THERE'S MORE - GO TO CNN STORY      POSTED 1/7/09

POSTED 1/7/09

Burris denied Senate seat in dramatic fashion

(From the Detroit Free Press) WASHINGTON – The political theater provided on CapitolRoland Burris Hill today as the 111th Congress came to Washington was a drama entitled “Mr. Burris Goes to Washington.”

As in Roland Burris, the 71-year-old former Illinois comptroller, attorney general and Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s pick to replace President-elect Barack Obama in the U.S. Senate. Blagojevich is under suspicion by federal prosecutors of trying to barter for seat and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada so far is refusing to honor Blagojevich’s selection of Burris – even though he’s under no ethical cloud himself.

Burris was mobbed by reporters and photographers as he came to the Capitol today, then, in a closed door meeting with the Secretary of Senate promptly had his credentials to be seated rejected. He then held an extraordinarily brief news conference in a sleety rain outside – he’s not a senator in the eyes of the Senate, after all, so he couldn’t hold it inside. Said Burris, “I’m not seeking any kind of confrontation” and then he departed, saying his next move will be decided by him and his lawyers.

THERE'S MORE - GO TO THE DETROIT FREE PRESS      POSTED 1/7/09

POSTED 1/6/09

"The People Can't Wait"

(From Blogging for Michigan by: wizardkitten)

President-elect Obama, after meeting with Nancy Pelosi this morning:
The reason we are here today is because the people can't wait. We have an extraordinary economic challenge ahead of us.

A long, long line of unemployed and hungry in Detriot

Detroiters line up today [Dec. 18] for items like food, toiletries, and toys in one of the poorest areas in the country, with a vast underclass and barely-perceptible aboveground economy colliding with the long-dead auto industry. [Getty]

Must be that he missed the Ren and Stimpy Reid and Steny Show yesterday. Instead of the message of "Yes, We Can!", Democratic leaders on the talking head shows indicated their game plan was, "Maybe, We Will. Someday. But Not Now". Here's Stimpy:

"It's going to be difficult to get the package together that early," he said. Instead, he told "Fox News Sunday," lawmakers hoped to have it to the new president by mid-February.

Here's Ren, a little better:

Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader, was more cautious about any deadline, saying simply, "We will work this just as quickly as we can." As to the amount of a stimulus package, he said only, "It's whatever it takes to bring this country back on a fiscal footing that's decent."

Sensing the opening that is being presented here, Mitch McConnell goes after the unemployed and uninsured first. Got to be able to pick up the easy meat with your eyes closed, right Mitch?

But Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, agreed with Hoyer that the Jan. 20 goal was impractical.

Mr. McConnell also expressed reservations about the ideas of extending unemployment benefits to part-time workers or expanding government-assisted health care insurance. "Those are very big systemic changes," he told ABC's "This Week," and so warranted public hearings and deliberate bipartisan discussions.

And of course we need to revisit the idea that "tax cuts will solve everything", because that is the only way Republicans will ever agree to do anything good for this country.

He also urged Obama to support an immediate middle-class tax cut - possibly lowering the 25-percent rate to 15 percent - saying, "This is the sort of thing we could have bipartisan agreement on."

Was going to just let all this slide and chalk it up to impatient pre-inauguration overreaction on my part, but then Paul Krugman raised an excellent point:

Look, Republicans are not going to come on board. Make 40% of the package tax cuts, they'll demand 100%. Then they'll start the thing about how you can't cut taxes on people who don't pay taxes (with only income taxes counting, of course) and demand that the plan focus on the affluent. Then they'll demand cuts in corporate taxes. And Mitch McConnell is already saying that state and local governments should get loans, not aid - which would undermine that part of the plan, too.

OK, maybe this is just a head fake from the Obama people - they think they can win the PR battle by making bipartisan noises, then accusing the GOP of being obstructionist. But I'm really worried that they're sending off signals of weakness right from the beginning, and that they're just going to embolden the opposition.

When Krugman backs up your paranoia, you know you have a problem. Let's hope we are both wrong about this.

Two weeks to go. Let's put a little more effort into our message in the meantime, OK Dems?

(From Blogging for Michigan by: wizardkitten)

POSTED 1/6/09

Detroit Seniors Going Hungry Increase

(From MichiganLiberal.Com by: DianeS)

The downturn in the economy that has hit Michigan especially hard is having a devastating effect on Detroit area senior citizens.

The Detroit News reports:

Ruby Allen can't remember the last time she went grocery shopping.

Instead, she relies on whatever food her children drop off, and the five frozen Meals on Wheels dinners delivered to her home each Monday.

"Without the meals, it would be hard for me to get three meals a day," the 80-year-old Detroiter said. "It would be breakfast and whatever I can get for lunch or dinner. Meals on Wheels helps me get through the week. I always tell people we were raised during the Great Depression. You learn to survive. You learn to make do with what you have."

But an increasing number of seniors don't have enough to make do. According to a recent national AARP survey, 59 percent of people 65 and older said rising costs and a tightening economy have made it more difficult for them to pay for essentials such as food, medicine and gas.

The United Way for Southeastern Michigan reports that 41,579 unique callers ages 50 and older telephoned its 211 helpline in 2008 for such basic needs, up from 16,702 callers in that age range in 2007. Detroit Meals on Wheels, which serves more than 1 million meals a year to people 60 and older, has a waiting list of nearly 700 hungry seniors, according to the Detroit Area Agency on Aging.

Below the fold, contact info for agencies that may be able to help, as well as ways to be of assistance...

There's More...

POSTED 1/5/09

Franken declares Senate race win after state ruling

(From CNN) Democrat Al Franken declared victory in the hotlyAl Frankencontested Minnesota Senate race Monday, saying the win is "incredibly humbling."

The Minnesota State Canvassing Board on Monday certified the results of the recount of Republican Sen. Norm Coleman's fight to retain his seat against Franken. The results showed Franken with a 225-vote lead.

"I am proud to stand before you as the next senator from Minnesota," Franken told reporters Monday night. "It's clear that we have a lot of important work to do ... I'm ready to go to Washington and get to work as soon as possible."

Coleman's attorney, Tony Trimble, said shortly after the ruling that the campaign will officially file a lawsuit. The Minnesota Republican's campaign later announced that he will make a public statement on Tuesday afternoon.

Coleman's campaign contends the recount should have included about 650 absentee ballots it says were improperly rejected in the initial count.

The initial count from the November 4 election put Coleman, a first-term senator, 215 votes ahead of Franken, who is known for his stint on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" and as a former talk-show host on progressive radio network Air America.

In Washington, the Senate's majority and minority leaders staked out opposing positions on the matter of who will serve Minnesota alongside Democrat Amy Klobuchar.

"There comes a time when you have to acknowledge that the race is over," Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, told reporters. "The race in Minnesota's over. Now it's only a little finger-pointing. The certification by the canvassing board, which has been in process for a number of weeks, now clearly shows that Al Franken has won."

Reid added later: "Coleman will never ever serve in the Senate. He's lost the election. He can stall things, but he'll never serve in the Senate."

Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, said: "The law in Minnesota requires certification from the secretary of state and that can't happen until the conclusion of all legal battles. It's not over."

Republican National Committee Chairman Mike Duncan echoed McConnell's criticism.

THERE'S MORE - GO TO CNN STORY      POSTED 1/5/09

POSTED 1/5/09

Bush Cites Failed Social Security Privatization Push As His Biggest Domestic Policy Achievement

(From Think Progress.com) The Weekly Standard’s Fred Barnes reports today that he and fellow conservative Bill Kristol met with President Bush last Friday for a lunch in the president’s “private dining room adjacent to the Oval Office.” According to Barnes, the “left-wing haters” are “going to be disappointed when they see his demeanor as he leaves his eight-year presidency” because Bush “appears comfortable with what he expects his legacy will be.”

Speaking of Bush’s legacy, Barnes reports that the president cited his push to privatizeBush laughing at the Ameircan people Social Security as his biggest domestic policy accomplishment:

On domestic policy, Bush was asked if he made progress in some areas for which he hasn’t and probably won’t get credit. Topping his list was his unsuccessful drive in 2005 to reform Social Security. Bush said his effort showed it’s politically safe to campaign on changing Social Security and then actually seek to change it.

He also said it was important to have raised private investment accounts as an attractive option in reforming Social Security.

It seems odd that Bush cited an unsuccessful effort as his biggest domestic policy achievement, but understandable given that he doesn’t have much else to consider. But not only was Bush’s drive to privatize Social Security an utter failure, the concept is also widely unpopular with the American public and if enacted, it would have had disastrous consequences for Americans’ retirement funds.

A recent Center for American Progress Action Fund report found that if a worker had retired on October 1, 2008 after 35 years of contributions to private retirement accounts, that retiree would have lost nearly $30,000 in retirement funds because of the downturn in the stock market over the last two years.

Part of the reason Bush’s push failed was that very few people actually believed he was trying to reform Social Security and instead thought he was trying to dismantle it. Even back in 2005, despite a lack of support for privatization, the Bush administration was insisting that their efforts were a “great success.”

Indeed, a recent CNN poll found that 62 percent of Americans oppose privatizing any part their Social Security taxes. But seeing that Bush regularly ignores what Americans think, its no wonder he thinks he doesn’t get enough credit for his privatization crusade.

(From Think Progress.com GO TO ITEM)

POSTED 1/5/09

Obama on his silence over Gaza violence: 'one president at a time'

(From Raw Story) President-elect Barack Obama Monday expressed concern about the Gaza crisis but stressed he would not interfere in "delicate negotiations" by the outgoing US administration.

Presdent Barack ObamaAsked about whether Israel's offensive against Hamas was distracting him from his economic agenda, Obama told reporters "obviously, international affairs are of deep concern."

"I strongly believe that a president or president-elect or his team should be able to do more than one thing at a time. With the situation in Gaza, I've been getting briefed every day," he said.

Obama has faced criticism for his silence on the Middle East violence, especially in the Arab world and European press. It adds to the huge challenges awaiting him when he succeeds President George W. Bush on January 20.

But the president-elect stressed: "I will continue to insist that when it comes to foreign affairs, it is particularly important to adhere to the principle of one president at a time, because there are delicate negotiations taking place right now and we can't have two voices coming out of the United States when you have so much at stake."

Israel has rejected worldwide calls for a ceasefire as the Palestinian death toll from its 10-day offensive in the Gaza Strip against the militant group Hamas tops 550.

Obama did not elaborate on the negotiations he mentioned. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has canceled a planned trip to China this week to deal with the crisis.

According to the Palestinians, Arab states are pushing for a UN Security Council resolution aimed at securing an immediate end to the "Israeli aggression" in Gaza.

Earlier Monday, Bush said he understood Israel's desire to defend itself, adding any Gaza ceasefire must ensure Hamas militants cannot fire rockets on Israeli towns.

There's More - Go to Raw Story Article      POSTED 1/5/09

POSTED 1/5/09

Obama to name Panetta to lead CIA, Blair as intelligence chief

(From CNN) Leon Panetta, chief of staff in President Bill Clinton's White House, will be President-elect Barack Obama's choice to be CIA director, two Democratic officials told CNN on Monday.

The officials also said retired Adm. Dennis Blair, who formerly headed the U.S. Navy's

Leon Panetta

Leon Panetta, who has a strong background in economics, was chief of staff for President Bill Clinton.

Pacific Command, will be tapped as director of national intelligence.

Panetta, 70, has had a long political career, beginning in 1966 when he served as a legislative assistant to U.S. Sen. Thomas H. Kuchel. R-California.

He was elected to the House of Representatives in 1977, serving California's 16th (now 17th) District until Clinton appointed him to head the Office of Budget and Management in 1993. He was chief of staff from 1994 to 1997.

Panetta and his wife, Sylvia, founded and co-direct the Leon and Sylvia Panetta Institute for Public Policy at California State University, which provides study opportunities for students there and at several other schools. He serves on several boards and committees, and lectures internationally on economics.

With a strong background in economics, Panetta has little hands-on experience in intelligence. But he is known as a strong manager with solid organizational skills.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who will be the new chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said she had not been told in advance of Panetta's selection.

"My position has consistently been that I believe the agency is best served by having an intelligence professional in charge at this time," the California Democrat said.

But Sen. Ron Wyden, a senior member of the Intelligence Committee, said he was consulted on the pick and praised Panetta.

"I believe he has the skills to usher in a new era of accountability at the nation's premier intelligence agency," said Wyden, D-Oregon. "For too long our nation's intelligence community has operated under a policy of questionable effectiveness and legality in which consulting two members of the Senate Intelligence Committee counted as 'consulting with Congress.' "

THERE'S MORE - GO TO CNN STORY      POSTED 1/5/09

POSTED 1/3/09

WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT

As I sit and use the benefit of hindsight there is one thing that becomes blatantly obvious to me, and that Jess Minksis, I am a very lucky man to have been privileged to meet and work with some of the genuinely nice people in Berrien County. The dedication shown the SCDC and the officers is astounding, when ask to work, the members did so with a zeal and gusto most asking for volunteers would not believe. The members know that we are all equals and willingly say O.K. to a project voted on by the majority even when we thought it was not the one we should do or do it differently. All the members realize that “you can’t win’em all” and go forward working very hard to make all events and happenings successful. They knew that the next time they could have the winning vote on a project and the method used to make it happen. This attitude and willingness to work together has made the South County Democratic Club one to be modeled by others.

As I look at what you have accomplished, keeping an office open for going on five years, registering voters, working at the polls, making phone calls, putting out yard signs, having the best web site in the state for a club, working the Blue Tiger project and being recognized on that web site, working the fair booth, the festivals all over the southern part of the county, the parades, the guest speakers from U.S. Senators to the Governor and Lt. Governor, local politicians that spoke, being represented at the State Central Committee, working on the two Presidential campaigns with results not seen in the county for decades, helping those that needed help, some with voting rights and the information that allowed them to vote, others it was simply putting them in touch with the proper agency to help them, then there is the always pleasure of helping the homeless Veterans. 

To the members and activists of the SCDC I say we have much to be proud of, but there is still work to be done. As you move forward into a new year and into new challenges, you must begin working on the task ahead with new ideas and new answers to the problems you will face to remain a viable and solvent club and as friends working to achieve all your goals.

REMEMBER ALL THAT HAVE BEEN WITH US AND LOOK FORWARD TO MEETING THOSE THAT WILL COME TO WORK WITH US.

POSTED 1/4/09

Obama Talks Action, Republicans Talk Obstruction

(From Blogging for Michigan by: wizardkitten)

01/03/09: President-elect Obama's Weekly Address
President Barack Obama
Click Image, above, to view You Tube video

The President-elect calls for bold, swift action to address the nation's economic crisis...

To put people back to work today and reduce our dependence on foreign oil tomorrow, we will double renewable energy production and renovate public buildings to make them more energy efficient.  To build a 21st century economy, we must engage contractors across the nation to create jobs rebuilding our crumbling roads, bridges, and schools.  To save not only jobs, but money and lives, we will update and computerize our health care system to cut red tape, prevent medical mistakes, and help reduce health care costs by billions of dollars each year. To make America, and our children, a success in this new global economy, we will build 21st century classrooms, labs, and libraries. And to put more money into the pockets of hardworking families, we will provide direct tax relief to 95 percent of American workers.

Republican members of Congress finished counting their latest raise in pay, looked up and said, "What? Help the American people? Create jobs? Reduce health care costs? Fix the infrastructure of this country? Educate children? Are you crazy? That might lead to waste and fraud!"

Mitch, you forgot "abuse". Geez, you can't even get the talking points right. It's no wonder y'all got thrown out of office in such massive numbers. Nevertheless, rumblings from the party of "fiscal responsibility" indicate that obstruction of the mandate delivered by the voters is in order here.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) voiced skepticism today about the emerging economic stimulus plan, applying a brake to Democratic plans to quickly pass up to $850 billion in spending and tax cuts soon after President-elect Barack Obama's Jan. 20 inauguration.

"As of right now, Americans are left with more questions than answers about this unprecedented government spending, and I believe the taxpayers deserve to know a lot more about where it will be spent before we consider passing it," McConnell said in a statement, which will be publicly issued later today.

NOW he cares about the "taxpayers". Right. Tell us another one, funny guy.

Obama already told you where the money is going, Senator. It's going to be spent trying to revive the economy and country that you destroyed. But, if you want to stop that from happening, well, must be that you really haven't learned anything yet, and we will just have to kick more of you out of office in 2010. The Republican Party will have smaller numbers than the Greens by the time this is all over.

Meet the new year, same as the old year...  

(From Blogging for Michigan)

POSTED 1/4/09

If You Do Nothing Else Today, Read Krugman

(From the Daily KOS by thereisnospoon )

Paul KrugmanAfter a lengthy hiatus from blogging over the holidays and during the seemingly interminable transition period, I re-emerged to write a diary today, my thoughts fully formulated and my mental outline ready to go.

Problem is, it turns out I have no need to write:  Paul Krugman already did it for me toda.

Krugman's column is one to print out, keep, and return to.  It is the most consequential thesis, and the most important development politically in over a generation.

From today's column, which really must be read in full (my emphasis added):

The fault, however, lies not in Republicans’ stars but in themselves. Forty years ago the G.O.P. decided, in effect, to make itself the party of racial backlash. And everything that has happened in recent years, from the choice of Mr. Bush as the party’s champion, to the Bush administration’s pervasive incompetence, to the party’s shrinking base, is a consequence of that decision...

"Government is not the solution to our problem," declared Ronald Reagan. "Government is the problem." So why worry about governing well?

Where did this hostility to government come from? In 1981 Lee Atwater, the famed Republican political consultant, explained the evolution of the G.O.P.’s "Southern strategy," which originally focused on opposition to the Voting Rights Act but eventually took a more coded form: "You’re getting so abstract now you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is blacks get hurt worse than whites." In other words, government is the problem because it takes your money and gives it to Those People.

This past election was the true test of the continued efficacy of that strategy.  On the one hand you had Barack Obama, an African-American candidate with Hussein as a middle name.  On the other, you had a campaign invigorated only by a racist appeal to "real Americans", a marked distaste for "community organizers" (the sort of people who only help organize "Those People") and embodied by a candidate whose very popularity owed itself to thinly veiled racism.  As nephewmiltie pointed out at RedState:

By the way: small government Sarah Palin actually increased spending in her state. So why did we presume that she supported small government and less spending? Simple: because she is a Republican from a state that doesn't have a Chicago, Detroit or Harlem in it.

Of course, Krugman goes on to point out that the 2008 election essentially rendered that strategy obsolete.  The puppetmasters of the Republican Party were never as concerned with rolling back the Great Society as they were with rolling back the New Deal.  Their racist base wanted the Great Society destroyed; the real power, however, used that racial resentment as a secret wedge to attempt to roll back the real target of their ire.  It is FDR, far more than LBJ, who is the real enemy of the Republican Party.   As I said before in Why the GOP is Seriously Screwed if Obama Wins:

[L]ooming on the GOP's horizon is its worst nightmare:the possibility that a majority of Americans might vote for an African-American for President..  And not just vote for one, but get used to one.  Americans might become accustomed to the idea of an African-American family living in the White House, and being its public face to the world.  That in the process, Americans might actually make leaps and bounds forward on the issue of race and thereby remove the most effective wedge in the Republican toolbox for decades.

And then all Republicans would have left is their deeply unpopular drive to abolish the New Deal.  It would, in short, spell utter doom for the Republicans outside of the deep South and certain pockets of the Midwest.

Nor would it be an easy wedge to replicate...[snip]

And that is why this election terrifies the GOP.  In just one election cycle, an entire agenda and electoral strategy spanning over three decades could be dashed on the rocks, with no credible replacement.  Milton Friedman's privatization agenda would be dead in the water, without hope of rescue barring military coup.  Republicans in this situation are like a  desperate, dangerous cornered animal.

Krugman, as usual, puts it best.  But he goes one step farther: it not just that Republicans will have to come up with a new playbook to remain competitive, but also that the constraints that used be upon the Democratic Party to create real change have essentially disappeared:

That’s why the soon-to-be-gone administration’s failure is bigger than Mr. Bush himself: it represents the end of the line for a political strategy that dominated the scene for more than a generation.

The reality of this strategy’s collapse has not, I believe, fully sunk in with some observers....

America in 1993 was a very different country — not just a country that had yet to see what happens when conservatives control all three branches of government, but also a country in which Democratic control of Congress depended on the votes of Southern conservatives. Today, Republicans have taken away almost all those Southern votes — and lost the rest of the country. It was a grand ride for a while, but in the end the Southern strategy led the G.O.P. into a cul-de-sac.

For the longest time, the progressive economic agenda was held hostage to vaguely economically progressive but socially retrograde racist Dixiecrats in the South.  When truly progressive economics required that all our nation's people have equal opportunity to share in the nation's wealth, those erstwhile alliances became strained or broken.  But today Democrats are no longer dependent on the likes of Zell Miller and his Dixiecratic friends to enact a progressive economic agenda.  The Republicans have painted themselves into a corner as the Party of the South, and Democrats have largely cleaned our own house of the racists.

All that leaves for us is the question of whether enough of our Democratic officials will recover from their Battered Wife Syndrome and reject the temptations of corporate corruption to truly herald the advent of a 2nd New Deal.

Because at this point, the Republican Party is basically incapable of stopping us until they figure out a new strategy to win elections--a not impossible but truly monumental task.  Nor are we as Democrats held back by the same constraints we once were. The time to seize the day is now, and the opportunity has never been more wide open.

Few in Washington yet realize the significance of this, but Krugman does.  If you do nothing else today, read his column in full.  Memorize it.  You'll be glad you did.

POSTED 1/4/09