|
 |
|



Lieutenant Governor Cherry, Senator Levin, Senator Stabenow, Governor
Blanchard, Secretary of State Land, Attorney General Cox, Justices of
the Supreme Court, Speaker of the House Andy Dillon, Senate Majority
Leader Mike Bishop, Mayor Kilpatrick, Mayor Heartwell.
My great family. My fellow citizens of the great state of Michigan.
You have returned me to this podium for a second and final time, and
I am very clear about the mission you have laid upon my shoulders and
upon my heart. I intend to do everything in my power to transform this
state and to provide opportunity to all who live here.
But I cannot do it alone; I need the full participation of all those
on this platform, but even more powerfully, you, our citizens, as well.
The times require honesty, and they demand leaders who will speak
candidly about our situation and boldly lead us through it to a better
future ... to the Next Michigan.
Those who came before us met the challenges of their day to build
Michigan anew. They:
• Forged a new state in a growing nation.
• Carved great cities from forest and field.
• Built prosperous manufacturing industries and formed great unions
to share that prosperity.
• Created, in the wake of war, an unprecedented middle class.
Michigan, we have thrived, and -- with the same toughness and grit
that marked our parents and grandparents -- we will thrive again.
To those who say that no state faces the challenge at our doorstep, I
say no state has the opportunity of the moment like ours. We will rise
to meet the challenge, because it's who we are, and it's who we will be.
Today, we do face a unique and massive challenge -- the
transformation of an entire state. |
|
There's More... |

POSTED
1/4/07 |
|

2006 County
Commission Races


|
|

2002-06
Gubernatorial Result Maps


|
|

2000-06
Senatorial Result Maps


|

PICTURE FROM LSJ
|
(From the diaries - promoted by matt)
UPDATE -- 12:45am! Several counties went to Granholm!
These are strict majority votes! This is MUCH better than the
Guv did in 2002 against Posthumus! Go Jen!
Yeah, they're done in Photoshop. But I don't have access to
GIS.
Since the Republicans love to state that Dems can only win in
the "big cities" or in that oh-so-dreadful Detroit, I want to
show how Granholm made gains ALL OVER MICHIGAN!
The scale is not graduated. Just basic poll numbers, colored
to the county majority vote. As poll results come in, I'll
update.
EDIT: This is done with CNN county polling data.
Lookit all those blue counties! Much better than against
Posthumus in 2002! :)
-B! |
Graphic Anatomy
of Victory: Michigan (w/maps)
This is an article from the Daily
KOS concerning the Democratic victory in Michigan. It has lots of
statistics and maps for those interested election numbers. |
(From
MichiganLiberal.Com by:
matt Tue Nov 14, 2006 at 15:45:17 PM
EST)
|
Senate Majority Leader:
Mike
Bishop (R-Rochester)

Biography
from the 2005-06 Michigan Manual:
Republican, of Rochester; born at Almont, Michigan; B.A.,
history, 1989, University of Michigan; Spanish language and
Spanish history study abroad, Universidad de Sevilla, Spain,
Summer 1988; J.D., 1993, Detroit College of Law with a term
studying international law and business at Cambridge University
in England and the University of Paris-Sorbonne in France; real
estate broker’s license, 1994, Curry Management Institute;
married to Cristina; son Benjamin, daughter Gabriella; member,
Bar of the Supreme Court of the United States, State Bar of
Michigan, Washington D.C. Bar, American Bar Association, Oakland
County Bar Association, Sports Lawyers Association; member,
Michigan Association of REALTORS; president and owner of Freedom
Realty, Inc., and of Pro Management, Inc.; former local
prosecuting attorney; practicing attorney; member, Republican
State Committee; 1996 Republican nominee for the University of
Michigan Board of Regents; elected to the House of
Representatives, 1998, 2000; elected to the State Senate, 2002;
Assistant Majority Leader.
Senate Minority Leader:
Mark
Schauer (D-Battle Creek)

Biography
from the 2005-06 Michigan Manual:
Democrat, of Battle Creek; born October 2, 1961; B.A. summa cum
laude, Albion College, 1984; Phi Beta Kappa; M.P.A., Western
Michigan University, 1987; M.A., 1996, and Ph.D. candidate,
Michigan State University; coordinator, Calhoun County Human
Services Coordinating Council, 1992-1997; executive director,
Community Action Agency of South Central Michigan, 1987-1992;
Battle Creek City Commissioner, 1995-1997; urban planner,
Calhoun County Planning Department, 1984-1987; community
involvement: Habitat for Humanity (founding member), Food Bank
of South Central Michigan, Calhoun County Democratic Party,
Chamber of Commerce, board of directors of Big Brothers Big
Sisters and Urban League of Battle Creek; elected to the House
of Representatives, 1996, 1998, 2000; elected to the State
Senate, 2002; Senate Democratic Floor Leader.
Speaker of the Michigan House:
Andy
Dillon (D-Redford Twp.)

Biography
from the 2005-06 Michigan Manual:
Democrat, of Redford Township; 43; wife, Carol; children, Matt,
Jack, Austin, and Teagan; member, St. Valentine Parish;
bachelor’s degree in accounting and law degree from the
University of Notre Dame; formerly managing director of
Wynnchurch Capital, president of DSC Ltd., aide to New Jersey
Senator Bill Bradley; attorney; magistrate for 17th District
Court; member, Redford Planning Commission; elected to the House
of Representatives in a special election, November 2004 and the
general election, 2004.
House Republican Leader:
Craig
DeRoche (R-Novi)

Biography
from the 2005-06 Michigan Manual:
Republican, of Novi; born October 4, 1970; wife, Stacey;
daughters, Carley and Zoe; graduated from Walled Lake Western
High School; attended Central Michigan University, bachelor’s
degree, finance; insurance work; former member, Novi City
Council; former member, advisory board for Michigan Political
Leadership program at Michigan State University; former member,
Novi Chamber of Commerce; Milford Presbyterian Church; elected
to the House of Representatives, 2002, 2004; elected Speaker of
the House, 2005. |
POSTED 11/15/07 |
|

U.S. Senator Harry Reid, of Nevada, a moderate Democrat who
favors a phased withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, was elected by
colleagues Tuesday as the new Senate majority leader for the 110th
Congress that will be seated in January.
After his expected, unchallenged election, Reid told reporters he
plans to work with the Republican minority "with open arms because we
realize that the only way to accomplish anything is on a bipartisan
basis." He said the incoming Democratic majority would "treat the
minority as they did not treat us. They will be involved in decisions."
He said his goal was to "reestablish the legislative branch of
government."
Sen. Richard Durbin, of Illinois, assistant minority leader
since January 2005, was elected majority whip. Democratic leaders asked
Sen. Charles Schumer, of New York, to stay on as the chairman of
the party's campaign committee after overseeing last week's midterm
elections. Schumer will also assume the title of vice chairman of the
Democratic caucus.
"He'll be called upon to do lots of different things," Reid said
about Schumer.
Sen. Patty Murray, of Washington state, was elected party
conference secretary and Sen. Debbie Stabenow from Michigan will head
the party steering committee.
"We know that America has spoken," Reid said after the morning caucus
meeting in the ornate Old Senate Chamber. "We must do everything we can
to move the country forward." Reid said the American middle class is
"getting squeezed." He said action needs to be taken on health care,
education, and relieving the tax burden on the middle class families.
Durbin said the Democrats realize that a "51-vote majority is as thin
as they come." He said they have a "chance, even a challenge, to restore
dignity to this great American institution."
Reid has served the past two years as Senate minority leader,
replacing Tom Daschle of South Dakota who lost his seat in the 2004
election.
Like other Democrats, Reid favors a phased withdrawal from Iraq,
beginning within months, a key issue in last week's elections that saw
the Democratic Party take control of both houses of Congress. As a
moderate Democrat, Reid breaks with many in his party in opposing
abortion and gun control.
Reid was born to a poor Nevada family who lived in a shack with no
toilet or hot water in the small desert town of Searchlight in 1939. He
earned a law degree while working as a U.S. Capitol police officer and
was a former amateur boxer.
Reid told the Associated Press that he supports former CIA director
Robert Gates as the new incoming secretary of defense and hopes to have
him confirmed by the end of the year.
"I hope we can move it forward quickly," Reid told the A.P.
Intellpuke: You can read this article by Washington
Post staff writer Daniela Deane, reporting from Washington, D.C., in
context here: www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/11/14/AR2006111400637.html
(From Free Internet
Press)
POSTED 11/15/06
Senate Committee Assignments
(From
MyDD
by Chris Bowers, Tue
Nov 14, 2006 at 04:30:45 PM EST)
I list them in the extended entry. I would be lying if I
said I understood the full scope of each, or really any, of
these committees, so basically I am just going to submit
them with comments.
Click "Read More" for the
rest...
Permalink ::
Read More
|
|
Democratic Tidal Wave Hits Michigan
Governor Granholm, Senator Stabenow
victorious by historic margins, Democrats
take control of U.S. House, U.S. Senate and
State House, sweep Education Boards
LANSING – Tuesday night,
Michigan Democrats celebrated the reelection
of Governor Granholm and Senator Stabenow,
both by historic margins. Democratic success
was not limited to the top of the ticket as
Democrats took control of U.S. House, U.S.
Senate, and State House of Representatives
and won every Education Board race on the
ballot. 3.8 million voters cast ballots this
year, setting a new record for turnout in an
non-presidential election.
"Tuesday, a record number of
Michigan voters made a very strong statement
that the Democratic Party is the party of
hope and vision. We made our differences
with the Republican Party very clear this
election. Michigan voters have had enough of
the Republican Party's extreme stances and
failed policies," said Michigan Democratic
Party Chair Mark Brewer. "Michigan's future
is very bright. I want to thank of all of
our grassroots activists and candidates who
worked very hard to make this a reality."
Michigan's election 2006
breakdown:
-
Governor - Governor
Granholm won a hard fought victory
by a margin of 56-42%. Granholm was
victorious despite an opponent who
spent $50 million, virtually all of
it his own money.
-
U.S. Senate -
Senator Stabenow won a decisive
57-41% victory. Democrats took
control of the U.S. Senate and
Stabenow could gain a seat on the
powerful Finance Committee in
addition to maintaining her role as
Secretary of the Democratic Caucus.
Senator Carl Levin will Chair the
influential Senate Armed Services
Committee.
-
U.S. House of
Representatives - All of
Michigan's incumbent Democratic
Representatives were reelected as
Democrats nationwide took back the
House. Many of Michigan's Members of
Congress will now chair important
committees and subcommittees. Rep.
John Conyers will Chair the House
Judiciary Committee. Rep. John
Dingell will Chair the House Energy
and Commerce Committee. Rep. Bart
Stupak is in the running for
Oversight and Investigations
Subcommittee Chair of the Energy and
Commerce Committee. Levin could
Chair the House Ways and Means
Social Security Subcommittee. Rep.
Kildee is in line to a lead a
subcommittee on education.
-
State House of
Representatives - Despite
the gerrymandered districts,
Democrats picked up 6 seats and took
control of the House for the first
time since 1997. Democrats now hold
58 seats to the Republicans' 52, and
have a net gain of eleven seats in
the last two cycles.
-
State Senate -
Again, despite the gerrymandered
districts, Democrats will gain at
least one seat in the State Senate.
-
Education and University
Boards - Democrats swept
every Education and University Board
seat. Democrats now have control of
all four Boards. Reginald Turner,
Jr. and Casandra Ulbrich were
elected to the State Board of
Education. Faylene Owen and George
Perles were elected to the Michigan
State University Board of Trustees.
Katherine White and Julia Darlow
were elected to the University of
Michigan Board of Regents. Eugene
Driker and Debbie Dingell were
elected to the Wayne State
University Board of Governors.
-
State Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Justice Michael
Cavanagh won reelection
|
|
|
|
|
Office |
Candidate |
Berrien County
(Unofficial) |
State
(Unofficial) |
|
Governor |
Rep -
DeVos
Dem - Granholm |
27,588
24,606 |
1,601,907 - 42%
2,124,356 - 56% |
|
Senator |
Rep -
Bouchard
Dem - Stabenow |
26,719
24,351 |
1,555,726 - 41%
2,133,162 - 57% |
|
U.S.
House |
Rep -
Upton
Dem - Clark |
33,034
18,923 |
142,015
- 61%
88,976 - 38% |
|
Secy of
State |
Rep -
Land
Dem - Sabaugh |
30,796
20,136 |
2,083,822 - 56%
1,545,627 - 42% |
|
Atty
General |
Rep -
Cox
Dem - Williams |
28,775
20,868 |
1,980,968 - 54%
1,588,666 - 44% |
|
State
Senate |
Rep -
Jelinek
Dem - Janowski |
31,705
20,034 |
50,182 -
58%
36,077 - 42% |
|
State
House 78th |
Rep -
Nitz
Dem - Truesdell
|
11,407 -
51%
10,164 - 48% |
|
|
State
House 79th |
Rep -
Proos
Dem - King |
19,660 -
65%
10,576 - 35% |
|
|
County Commission
District 3
District 4
District 10
District 11 |
Dem - Seats
Dem - Yarbrough
Dem - Vavra
Rep - Ryman
Dem - Minks |
1,983
1,776
3,152
2,189
1,837 |
|
|
Buchanan
Twp Super |
Rep -
Mitchell
Dem - Stough |
770
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposal 1 - Conservation Fund
Michigan
99% Precincts
Reporting
Yes 2,895,790
81% . No 674,517 19% |
|
Proposal 2 - Affirmative Action
Michigan
99% Precincts
Reporting .
Yes 2,131,488
58% . No 1,539,431 42% |
|
Proposal 3 - Dove Hunting Michigan
99% Precincts
Reporting
No 2,514,518 69%
. Yes 1,131,831 31% |
|
Proposal 4 - Eminent Domain
Michigan
99% Precincts
Reporting
Yes 2,896,521
80% . No 716,738 20% |
|
Proposal 5 - School Fund Michigan
99% Precincts
Reporting
No 2,245,597 62%
. Yes 1,355,700 38% |
|
INDIANA

U.S. Rep. District 2
District Wide 100% Precincts Reporting
Joe Donnelly
104,016 - 54% -- Chris Chocola 88,871 - 46% |
|
|
|
The Guardian
has the scoop:
Abuses carried out under the CIA's secret programme of
extraordinary rendition are to be investigated by one of the
Senate's most powerful committees, it emerged today.
The new chairman of the Senate armed services committee,
the Democratic senator Carl Levin, revealed that he was "not
comfortable" with the rendition system and said it was
making the US less secure. ...
Asked whether he would investigate the renditions
programme, including the secret prisons and missing
detainees, Mr Levin replied: "Yes. Yes, yes and yes." ...
Amnesty International has described extraordinary
renditions as a policy of "disappearances" and welcomed Mr
Levin's announcement.
"It is long overdue," an Amnesty spokeswoman said. "Many
aspects of the US war on terror are of concern and are
questionable. There is a need for greater transparency and
we need to know who has been taken and where." ...
Mr Levin made his comments as he was outlining the
priorities of the committee after the Democrats' gain in
last week's midterm elections. The first order of business
would be to change the direction of Iraq policy, he said.
Good going for Michigan’s longest-serving US Senator in
history, whom TIME Magazine named one of
America’s 10 Best Senators. Now if only we can get
Debbie on board... |
POSTED 11/15/06 |

(This is an editorial from the
Traverse City Record Eagle which I found to be
interesting. Please visit the Traverse City Record Eagle,
link at the bottom. -mike)
It's been called "political pornography,"
and for the past few months, Michigan voters have been
swimming in it.
There were "push polls" in which a caller
hinting that he or she is taking a poll instead accuses a
candidate of wanting to raise taxes or coddle activist
judges or promote gay marriage.
There were so-called "robo calls" at all
hours of the day and night either bashing a candidate or
urging a vote for someone.
Then there were the TV ads, many financed
by shadowy special-interest groups, chock-full of complete
fabrications, phrases taken out of context and half quotes
that twisted the truth. Lies and damned lies. And yes, there
were even statistics; most of the time they lied, too.
Other ads hinted at candidates' dark
sides, or portrayed them as puppets or tools of some
sinister agenda. Gays were favorite targets.
Unless voters demand that lawmakers act
now to curb the worst of this stuff, 2006 will look like a
warm-up compared to what we can expect two years from now.
And that is simply unacceptable.
Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land has
already laid out an excellent beginning with her proposed
instant notification law, or what she calls real-time
campaign disclosure.
Under her proposal, money donated to
election campaigns would be immediately posted online for
the public to see, and could not be deposited or spent until
it was posted.
Currently, big-money donations to
candidates can remain essentially secret for months, until
the next campaign reporting deadline rolls around. By that
time, the money has usually been spent and the public
doesn't find out until well after the fact which political
action committee or big donor jumped in to sway the
election.
State Sen. Michelle McManus, R-Lake
Leelanau, has said she wants to lead an effort to toughen
campaign finance laws, in particular requiring full public
disclosure of state political funds known as 527 accounts,
through which politicians can accept unlimited donations
from corporations, unions, casino interests and others
banned from giving to political accounts. Sen. Jason Allen,
R-Traverse City, is the only northern Michigan politician
who uses such funds.
The Internal Revenue Service requires
disclosure of federal 527 accounts, but 527 accounts used by
state and local office holders are exempt.
McManus also wants to make public
disclosure of campaign finances more frequent and more
detailed.
Lawmakers must also find ways to require
those paying for push polls or robo calls to plainly and
clearly identify that these are election ads and who is
paying the bill.
This isn't about altruism and wanting to
keep to the spirit of a free and open democratic process
anymore. We're well past that, to the stage where the
integrity of every election is now at stake.
The past few years have seen the emergence
of individuals willing to spend vast amounts of money to
influence a broad sweep of elections in an attempt to alter
the process on a huge scale. And often, because of
Michigan's archaic campaign finance laws, their influence in
a race can be kept under wraps until long after the damage
has been done.
Kalamazoo billionaire Jon Stryker set up a
fund through which he spent more than $4.5 million on a
series of ads targeting the Republican Party and, in
northern Michigan, Rep. Dave Palsrok, R-Manistee.
Massive personal spending on one's own
campaign is also on the rise. While such spending is about
as transparent as it gets, it raises a question — can
someone buy an elected office if they just have enough to
spend?
Republican gubernatorial candidate Dick
DeVos spent a reported $35 million of his own money to fund
a months-long TV ad blitz, an amount unprecedented in
Michigan. From Aug. 1 to Oct. 15, the DeVos campaign aired
20,000 television ads statewide, which comes out to more
than 250 a day, or more than 10 an hour.
Clearly, the most heinous forms of
electioneering have now come to northern Michigan, and
there's every reason to believe that 2008 will bring much
more. While some lawmakers seem committed to cleaning up the
system, others — a likely majority — won't do a thing unless
they're forced to. Campaign cash, after all, is what keeps
them employed.
While the sour taste of push polls and
robo calls and lying TV ads is still fresh, write your
representative and senator and demand change. If you don't,
expect more.
Visit the Traverse City Record Eagle
POSTED 11/15/06
|
|

It looks like someone else is in a state of denial.

Yesterday, former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani set up an
exploratory committee for a possible run at the Republican presidential
nomination in 2008. Arizona Senator John McCain made a similar
announcement over the weekend. It is likely that Bill Frist, Mitt
Romney, George Pataki and Mike Huckabee will do the same in the coming
weeks.
As of now, if he does indeed run, Giuliani will try to gain
Republican support by cuddling up to President Bush. The former New York
Mayor defended George W. Bush yesterday, even comparing the recent
anti-Bush sentiment to the kind that the late Winston Churchill received
years ago:
"It doesn't matter what
the media does to ridicule him or misinterpret him or defeat him. They
ridiculed Winston Churchill. They belittled Ronald Reagan. But like
President Bush, they were optimists. Leaders need to be optimists. Their
vision is beyond the present, and it's set on a future of real peace and
security," Giuliani said.
I will give Giuliani one thing: It is easy to misinterpret a guy who
has trouble finishing a sentence. But it sure isn't easy to misinterpret
policies that have hurt working families in this country. That was why
Bush and his party got a vote of 'no confidence' one week ago.
Really though, I can understand quite well why Giuliani would want to
cozy up to Bush when he runs for president. The two have the same
mentality when it comes to invoking 9/11 for the moral high ground on
everything. In other words, expect the campaign to turn into an "I was
there and you weren't" sort of thing.
FROM -- The Blue State A
Young Progressive's Daily Analysis of Political News, Elections and
Campaign Strategy
POSTED 11/15/06 |
You think the
anti-Republican sentiment is not
felt in every pocket of the
country? Try
this on for size:
Marie
Steichen died two months ago but
she won a battle to become a
county commissioner for a small
South Dakota town in the US
elections,
an official said.
Jerauld county
auditor Cindy Peterson said that
the election list closed on
August 1, and while Steichen
died from cancer in September
her name was kept on the
list for Tuesday's election.
Steichen beat a Republican rival
by 100 votes to 64
and Peterson said she
believed that voters knew the
woman was dead but wanted to
make their political point.
This is analogous
to what happened in November of 2000
when John Ashcroft
lost to Mel Carnahan for
Missouri's Senate seat. Carnahan
died about two weeks before the
vote. Ashcroft went on to become
Bush's Attorney General.
FROM -- The Blue State A
Young Progressive's Daily Analysis of Political News, Elections and
Campaign Strategy
POSTED 11/15/06 |
|
(From RAW STORY) Congresswoman
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has officially been named Speaker-elect of the House
of Representatives, RAW STORY has learned.
Democrats chose Pelosi unanimously earlier this morning. Rep. Jim
Clyburn (D-SC) was elected majority whip and Rep. Rahm Emanuel (D-IL)
was chosen to become caucus chairman.
Democratic Representatives then defied the new speaker-elect in the
contentious battle for majority leader between Reps. John Murtha (D-PA)
and Steny Hoyer (D-MD), which ended with Hoyer trouncing Murtha in a
vote of 149-86.
Pelosi had lobbied on behalf of Murtha, a controversial and
conservative Pelosi loyalist, against Hoyer, who had once challenged the
speaker-elect to become minority whip.
"We've had our debate," Pelosi announced immediately after what she
characterized as Hoyer's "stunning" victory. "Now, that is over. As we
say in church, let there be peace on earth--and let it begin with us."
POSTED 11/17/06 |
|
|
| A trade pact with Vietnam,
written by industry lobbyists, was being
rammed through yesterday.
It seem the Republicans didn't get the message last Tuesday
and are in their "last throes" of trying to get through unfair
trade deals.
Of interest to MichLibbers is the votes cast by our very own
Michigan delegation.
In a state where we are getting hammered and bleeding jobs
due to free trade deals that have wreaked our economy, you would
think that all of our Representatives could be counted on to
vote no...
You'd be wrong.
The Rogues gallery is on the flip side: |
|
There's More... |
POSTED 11/15/06 |
|
SIERRA CLUB DECLARES
VICTORY AS POMBO (CA-11) GOES DOWN

Statement by Executive Director Carl Pope
Pleasanton, CA - "The Sierra Club congratulates Jerry McNerney on his
important victory over Richard Pombo. We salute McNerney for fighting
the good fight, for defying the odds and taking on Pombo when almost no
one else would. Jerry McNerney's win is testament to the values of
courage and persistence. The hope he has given to millions of
Californians and Americans will not go away any time soon.
"It has been clear to us for a long time that Richard Pombo's views
were way too extreme and his relationships to special interests way too
cozy to honestly serve the public on issues like clean air, clean water,
and protecting wildlands. We are very pleased to see that the voters in
the 11th-district agreed with us.
"The hundreds of Sierra Club volunteers and staff who worked
tirelessly this past year to hold Richard Pombo accountable deserve a
ton of credit for turning what many pundits thought would be a cakewalk
for the incumbent into a win. They, along with fellow environmental
organizations, sent an important message that any candidate who allows
him or herself to be recklessly out of touch with mainstream
environmental values is vulnerable.
"Pombo's defeat is not just a victory for
the people of California's 11th-district. This is a moment to be savored
by anyone who loves Yosemite National Park or the California coast or
Giant Sequoia National Monument, places Pombo worked to mine, drill, or
log. On the issue of energy policy in particular, America is extremely
fortunate to be replacing someone who's energy priorities were dictated
by Big Oil with a man who is an expert on renewable wind power and who
has the vision to help our nation develop smart new energy technologies
and jobs."
For detailed information on the Sierra Club Political Committee
efforts to defeat Richard Pombo, go to:
http://www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/pr2006-11-07.asp
|
|

|
|

(Click on the name)











|
SOLDIER IN IRAQ (AND THEN HAVE THE AUDACITY TO CRITICIZE
JOHN KERRY FOR A JOKE!). IS THERE NO SHAME TO THE REPUBLICAN
PARTY?

(From the Daily KOS by
georgia10 Wed
Nov 01, 2006 at 06:35:06 PM PST)
Meet
Ahmed Qusai al-Taei. He's an American. He's a soldier.
And he's been kidnapped in Iraq.
He was kidnapped at gunpoint on October 23rd, when
militiamen handcuffed him and shoved him into the trunk of a
car. The military immediately set up
roadblocks and checkpoints in Sadr City, a neighborhood
of Baghdad where it was suspected the kidnappers were hiding
the captured soldier. Every car in and out of the area was
inspected for him. Houses were searched. Drones were used.
The full force of the United States military demonstrated
that it would not leave a man behind.
Until the Iraqi government forced us out of Sadr City. The
military obeyed, and retreated. And
the soldier's fate remains unknown.
More below...

A PARTY WITHOUT
MORAL VALUES!
(From "No
More Apples" website
posted by Motherlode at
10:20 AM)
I was about to post on my outrage at the
media hullaballoo over John Kerry's botched joke while
virtually ignoring the fact that our vaunted
Commander-in-Chief yesterday pulled our soldiers off their
checkpoints in Sadr City at the behest of Iraq's Maliki (who
was just taking orders from Moqtada al-Sadr). Yes, folks,
Bush ABANDONED A KIDNAPPED U.S. SOLDIER to the bloody Mahdi
Army.
But then I ran across Sully's post of the
day, and he says it well so I don't have to:
The U.S. military does not have a
tradition of abandoning its own soldiers to foreign
militias, or of taking orders from foreign governments. No
commander-in-chief who actually walks the walk, rather than
swaggering the swagger, would acquiesce to such a thing. The
soldier appears to be of Iraqi descent who is married to an
Iraqi woman. Who authorized abandoning him to the enemy? Who
is really giving the orders to the U.S. military in Iraq?
These are real questions about honor and sacrifice and a war
that is now careening out of any control. They are not phony
questions drummed up by a partisan media machine to appeal
to emotions to maintain power.
And where, by the way, is McCain on this?
Silent on Cheney's "no-brainer" on waterboarding. Silent
recently on Iraq. But vocal - oh, how vocal - on Kerry. It
tells you something about what has happened to him. And to
America.
Yep, it says something, all right. George
Bush can lead 3,000 American soldiers to their deaths, but
heaven help John Kerry for saying anything that could be
construed, rightly or wrongly, as dissing them.
POSTED 11/2/06 |
|

(This excerpt is from a copyrighted story from the "Editor
& Publisher" website, please used the hyperlink at the bottom to
read the entire story.)
The true stories of how American troops, killed in Iraq, actually
died keep spilling out this week. On Tuesday, we explored the case of
Kenny Stanton, Jr., murdered last month by our allies, the Iraqi police,
though the military didn’t make that known at the time. Now we learn
that one of the first female soldiers killed in Iraq died by her own
hand after objecting to interrogation techniques used on prisoners.
She was Army specialist Alyssa Peterson, 27, a Flagstaff, Az., native
serving with C Company, 311th Military Intelligence BN, 101st Airborne.
Peterson was an Arabic-speaking interrogator assigned to the prison at
our air base in troubled Tal-Afar in northwestern Iraq. According to
official records, she died on Sept. 15, 2003, from a “non-hostile
weapons discharge.”
She was only the third American woman killed in Iraq so her death
drew wide press attention. A “non-hostile weapons discharge” leading to
death is not unusual in Iraq, often quite accidental, so this one
apparently raised few eyebrows. The Arizona Republic, three days after
her death, reported that Army officials “said that a number of possible
scenarios are being considered, including Peterson's own weapon
discharging, the weapon of another soldier discharging or the accidental
shooting of Peterson by an Iraqi civilian.”
But in this case, a longtime radio and newspaper reporter named Kevin
Elston, unsatisfied with the public story, decided to probe deeper in
2005, "just on a hunch," he told E&P today. He made "hundreds of phone
calls" to the military and couldn't get anywhere, so he filed a Freedom
of Information Act request. When the documents of the official
investigation of her death arrived, they contained bombshell
revelations. Here’s what the Flagstaff public radio station, KNAU, where
Elston now works, reported yesterday:
“Peterson objected to the interrogation techniques used on prisoners.
She refused to participate after only two nights working in the unit
known as the cage. Army spokespersons for her unit have refused to
describe the interrogation techniques Alyssa objected to. They say all
records of those techniques have now been destroyed….”
She was was then assigned to the base gate, where she monitored Iraqi
guards, and sent to suicide prevention training. “But on the night of
September 15th, 2003, Army investigators concluded she shot and killed
herself with her service rifle,” the documents disclose.
The Army talked to some of Peterson's colleagues. Asked to summarize
their comments, Elston told E&P: "The reactions to the suicide were that
she was having a difficult time separating her personal feelings from
her professional duties. That was the consistent point in the
testimonies, that she objected to the interrogation techniques, without
describing what those techniques were."
GO TO EDITOR AND PUBLISHER
POSTED 11/2/06

A PARTY WITHOUT MORAL VALUES! |
|


South Bend Airport - October 28, 2006
Representative John Conyers, Jr.,
a Detroit Democrat, was re-elected to the 14th Congressional District in
November 2004, to his 20 term in the U.S. House of Representatives.
The district covers all of Highland Park and Hamtramck, as well as
large portions of Detroit and Dearborn. Due to the Congressional
redistricting of 2000 Representative Conyers also now represents the
Down River communities of Melvindale, Allen Park, Southgate, Riverview,
Trenton,Gibraltar, and Grosse
Kim Clark and John Conyers

From the
Kim Clark for
Congress Website
Fighting for Michigan's Working Families
Representative Conyers has spent his entire career fighting for
Michigan's working families. As a supporter of the UAW, Congressman
Conyers is well aware of the struggles that affect working families.
With families facing skyrocketing health care costs, rising unemployment
and an outdated minimum wage, Conyers continues to fight for equal pay
for women and minorities, a raise in the minimum wage, and full
employment for all Americans. He opposes the Bush Administration's
attempts to roll back worker safety standards, the elimination of
overtime in favor of flex-time, and efforts to undermine workers'
collective bargaining rights in both the public and private sectors.
Currently, Mr. Conyers is working on legislation that Would protect
workers' pensions and health care in cases of bankruptcy such as those
involving Enron, Worldcom, and National Steel.

Congressman Conyers and candidate Jess Minks, 11th
District County Commission
Working for Quality, Affordable Healthcare
For more than three decades, Congressman Conyers has led efforts in
Congress to reform the health care system. He is the founder and
chairman of the Congressional Universal Health Care Task Force, a 45
member caucus whose mission is to pass universal health care legislation
by 2005. This legislation would guarantee every American access to
affordable, comprehensive, quality health care. The caucus introduced
House Concurrent Resolution 99, which has the support of over 450
grassroots organizations across the country, and dozens of Members of
Congress. He recently introduced the United States National Health
Insurance Act, H.R. 676, a Medicare For All Single Payer bill which has
the endorsement of over 4000 physicians nationally. Further,
Representative Conyers introduced the Resident Physician Safety
Protection Act in order to reduce the hours that resident physicians
work, so they can perform at optimal levels. The American Medical
Association and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education
have adopted major provisions of the bill.

Congressman Conyers and candidate Jess Minks, 11th
District County Commission, conversing outside South Bend Airport
POSTED 11/2/06 |
|
Kim Clark Running Strong - On the Ground and on TV 
Greetings!
To paraphrase
Tom Dobbs, Congressmen are a lot like dirty diapers. They
need to be changed regularly, and for the same reason. It’s
time to change back to truly conservative values like
congressional oversight, public debate, and accountability.
In a show of
strength unprecedented for a Democratic candidate in the 6th
Congressional District, Kim will be running
television commercials
from now through election day. If you haven’t spotted them
yet, you can see them all
here. But change
doesn’t come free, and there are only ten days left.
Checks are welcome,
and balances are
necessary for us to get the word out. So if you have any
spare change, now’s the
time.
Thank you.
Kim Clark for Congress
|
|
|
POSTED 8/26/06

DeVos. DeRoche. DeLay. DeSame
Republican candidate campaigning for vouchers.
YOU'LL FIND NO HONOR OR INTEGRITY HERE
You’re a moderate Republican. You’re intelligent,
successful, and you’re a patriot to your country and your state. You
believe in fiscal responsibility, you believe in law and order, you
believe in protecting our environment, you believe in safeguarding the
safety and security of our families, you believe in defending our
infrastructure from attack (or just selling it as Indiana Republicans
did to the Toll Road). In short, you believe in just about everything
that Governor Jennifer Granholm stands for.
You are intelligent and reasonable; you are a
thinker and not a follower. You see Granholm as a good person who has
done much to improve the economic position of Michigan in the global
economy. You see Granholm as a decent and honorable person. You are
disturbed by the ads that the Republican candidate runs on TV – lies and
distortions and not much substance about his agenda. For example, in one
recent ad he stands before a GM factory being torn down and decries our
governor – but fails to mention that the factory is nearly 100 years old
and GM is REPLACING IT with another across town. He fails to mention
that the Governor has saved those jobs! Lies and dishonor do not appeal
to you!
As a moderate Republican you have seen your party
hijacked by extremists – ideologues whose beliefs have nothing to do
with reality. Or, if not ideologues, you see your party dominated by
right-wing religious extremists and fanatics (there is just no other way
to describe these misguided people bent upon destroying basic American
convictions as they established the new American theocracy).
As a moderate you watched the primary election and
you saw that every Republican of common sense and intelligence was
defeated by religious or ideologue extremists. Every moderate Republican
was defeated in the primary – every one of them!
As a final insult to your common sense and
intelligence, your party has put up the Amway Guy for Governor. The
Amway Guy! Think about that – his family was the genius behind this
great pyramid scheme that cheated millions of people out of their hard
earned money. This ….. (words escape me at this insult to good
Republicans everywhere) …. most despicable “businessman” [“cheat:
would be a better term] is now your party’s candidate for governor!
On top of that, the Amway Guy is a
religious
extremist. He was the main force behind the voucher ballot issue several
years ago. Common sense Republicans and Democrats joined together to
defeat the Amway Guy two to one on that idiotic proposal that would have
destroyed public schools in Michigan. To this day, the Amway Guy and his
family support PAC’s that promote the voucher issue in different states.
This is fact – although his campaign is too dishonest to tell you -- he
still believes in and supports vouchers.
This extremist thinks public schools should
teach creationism in Michigan science classrooms. The Detroit Free
Press reports (September 20, 2006) -- The Republican gubernatorial
candidate thinks Michigan’s science curriculum should include a
discussion about intelligent design. Intelligent design is creationism.
“I would like to see the ideas of intelligent design that many
scientists are now suggesting is a very viable alternative theory,”
DeVos told the Associated Press this week during an interview on
education. (What reputable scientist thinks creationism is a viable
alternate theory? Name just one.) A federal judge, a patriot, in
December barred the school system in Dover, Pa., from teaching
intelligent design alongside evolution in high school biology classes.
The judge said intelligent design is religion masquerading as science
and that teaching it alongside evolution violates the separation of
church and state.
So, what is a decent, thinking, intelligent,
moderate Republican to do?
A Charlevoix business man, a moderate
Republican, has started a group called
Republicans for Granholm. Gil Ziegler wants to see
Republicans keep control of the legislature; but, when it comes to a
choice between GOP Amway Guy and Jennifer Granholm, he’s voting
Democratic.
From the
South Bend Tribune (8/25/06) “As an automotive supplier, no one
needs to tell me that Michigan has taken some hard hits in its
manufacturing economy,” said Ziegler, who owns Alken-Ziegler, a
privately held metal forming and machining company with offices in
Kalkaska and Livonia, where Ziegler also has a home.
“Governor Granholm has strategies in place to bring
us through this difficult period, with a stronger and more diverse
economy in the future,” he added.

You know in your heart, it's right!
You haven't left your party; your party left you!
 |
(From
MichiganLiberal.Comby:
matt Thu Oct 26, 2006 at 22:47:51 PM EDT)
|
Let me be clear: I don't really believe the headline above.
I just put it up there to get you prepared for the headlines
you're probably going to see over the next several days. Get
used to it.
In spite of a
series of other polls that all show improvement for Governor
Granholm, my guess is we're going to hear a lot about
the ONE poll (EPIC-MRA) that supposedly shows her doing
worse. Why? Because EPIC-MRA is the annointed pollster for the
Detroit News, WXYZ-TV, WOOD-TV, WILX-TV, and WJRT-TV.
Don't expect to hear about any of the other polls from those
outlets either.
Instead, we're going to see headlines and leads that talk about
how Amway Guy is "narrowing the gap" and "showing new signs of
strength", a "resurgence", a wave of excitement, etc. Never mind
that the only other pollster (Mitchell) who shows anything like
this occuring
takes money from the DeVos for Governor campaign.
After this narrative is repeated enough times, people will begin
to believe it. Since everyone likes to be be with a winner,
subsequent polls will probably show an actual uptick for DeVos.
Look for those polls to be mentioned prominently, no
matter who conducted them. They fit with the new narrative.
Wash, rinse, and repeat.
So what about this new EPIC-MRA poll showing Amway Guy "pulling"
within 5 points of the Governor (according
to the DN)?
|
10/10-10/12
|
10/22-10/25
|
Granholm (D)
|
51%
|
48%
|
Amway Guy (R)
|
42%
|
43%
|
Undecided
|
5%
|
7%
|
n=600. Margin of error +/- 4%
Well, for one thing, if the poll is to be believed and you
accept the comparison with the previous poll, Amway Guy isn't
pulling anywhere. He moved up a grand total of 1 percent.
The margin of error on both polls is four percent. I'll say it
again: THE MARGIN OF ERROR IS 4%. Details, details...
Another issue: take a look at the poll questions -
here and
here. Notice that the questions leading up to the DeVos vs.
Granholm question are NOT the same. Most notably, notice that
this question (from the first poll):
Over the next six months to a year, do you think Michigan's
economy will improve, get worse, or remain about the same?
Morphs into this question (from the second):
Overall, would you say that things in Michigan are generally
headed in the right direction, or have things pretty
seriously gotten off on the wrong track?
Cute, huh? Could this wording change make a difference in how
respondents answer the Granholm/DeVos question...enough to take
the Governor down 3%? Hard to say for sure, but it certainly
seems conceivable.
But who cares about any of that? If you're an editor, you want
an exciting, barnburner horse race! And besides, that Granholm
has had a pretty good run. Time to give a break to that Amway
billionaire guy running against her. Fair and balanced, you
know.
(sigh)
What can we do about any of this?
Cheer loudly for your Detroit Tigers. |
POSTED 10/27/06 |
|


The government is using so much in
surplus Social Security taxes that it eventually must repay. When
that is added to the official deficit numbers, [Sen. Kent] Conrad
[North Dakota] said, the
country had an additional $550 billion in debt last year. "It's
amazing how word games have been used to hide from the American
people how serious our fiscal situation really is," Conrad said in
an interview. "All of the happy talk is just that."


(From CNN - 10/22/06) President
Bush, who gets higher marks for handling the economy than running the
Iraq war, is spending two days this week trying to convince voters
Republicans are the best stewards of matters affecting the wallet.
White House advisers said Sunday that Bush is not trying to change
the subject from a deteriorating situation in Iraq, and that he will
continue to talk about Iraq and the war on terrorism as the November 7
election nears. Bush advisers said they think the president should get
more credit for recent positive economic news.
Overall, the economy grew at a 2.6 percent pace from April through
June, compared with a 5.6 percent pace over the first three months of
the year, which was the strongest spurt in 2½ years. Still, voters
remain uneasy even though gasoline prices have started dropping, the
stock market is hitting record highs, and interest rates on credit cards
and adjustable mortgages are leveling off.
White House spokesman Tony Fratto said Bush intends to mention how
optimism about the economy and rising hopes for strong third-quarter
earnings lifted the Dow Jones industrial average past 12,000 for the
first time on Wednesday. The Conference Board's index of U.S. leading
economic indicators rose last month, and the government reported last
week that consumer prices fell in September by the largest amount in 10
months.
America's voters care deeply about pocketbook issues. Eighty-eight
percent of likely voters say the economy is an important issue -- on par
with the percentage of people who view the situation in Iraq and
terrorism as crucial matters, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos
poll.
The AP-Ipsos poll this month found that 37 percent of likely
voters say they approve of Bush's handling of Iraq overall. Forty-two
percent approve of his handling of the economy.
(GO TO CNN STORY)

The federal budget deficit shrank from $318 billion to less than
$260 billion in the fiscal year that concluded in September,
officials disclosed yesterday. It marks the second year in a row
that the deficit has declined after ballooning in the early years of
the Bush administration. White House officials hailed the improving
short-term budget picture as a vindication of President Bush's
tax-cutting agenda, though the long-term prospects are considerably
bleaker, given the escalating costs of health-care and retirement
programs and, in the view of many economists, the red ink produced
by tax cuts.
Bush pointed to the declining budget deficit in remarks Tuesday
evening at a fundraiser in Georgia, where he once again sought to
frame next month's midterm elections in part as a referendum on tax
cuts that he says have stimulated revenue. The nation "has got this
choice to make," Bush told donors here. "Do we keep taxes low so we
can keep this economy growing, or do we let the Democrats in
Washington raise taxes and hurt the economic vitality of this
country?"
The president will step up his efforts to tout the economy at a
White House event Wednesday, when officials said he will announce
that he has met his target of cutting the deficit in half over five
years - three years ahead of schedule.
That promise was based on what officials once projected would be
a $521 billion deficit in 2004. One senior White House official, who
spoke on the condition of anonymity because the president has not
officially announced the numbers, said the deficit for 2006 will be
less than $260 billion, "with a significant margin." The
Congressional Budget Office estimated last week the deficit would be
$250 billion.
One reason the goal was achieved is that the bar was set low.
As the economy improved, the $521 billion deficit never
materialized, and the government ended 2004 with a $412 billion
deficit. Moreover, Bush's policies, including the tax cuts and war
spending, helped wipe out the surplus that his administration
inherited from the Clinton administration in 2001; Democrats point
out that the government was supposed to be running a $300 billion
surplus this past year, so in effect, they say, there has been a
downward swing of more than half a trillion dollars.
Sen. Kent Conrad (North Dakota), the
ranking Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee, said the deficit
numbers mask the broader problem, which is that the government is
using so much in surplus Social Security taxes that it eventually
must repay. When that is added to the official deficit numbers,
Conrad said, the country had an additional $550 billion in debt last
year. "It's amazing how word games have been used to hide from the
American people how serious our fiscal situation really is," Conrad
said in an interview. "All of the happy talk is just that."


| |